United States Supreme Court
443 U.S. 622 (1979)
A Massachusetts law requires parental notice and consent for any unmarried minor seeking an abortion in the state. If one or both parents refuse consent, the law provides an alternative procedure whereby the minor can obtain an abortion by appearing before a judge and receiving approval for the procedure, although parental notification is still required before the procedure can be performed. Baird (plaintiff) brought a class action suit on behalf of pregnant minors in federal district court against Bellotti and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (defendants) challenging the constitutionality of the statute as a violation of Roe v. Wade (1973). The district court invalidated the statute as unconstitutional, and Bellotti appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)
Concurrence (Stevens, J.)
Concurrence (Rehnquist, J.)
Dissent (White, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.