Beltronics USA v. Midwest Inventory Distribution
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
562 F.3d 1067 (2009)
- Written by Jenny Perry, JD
Facts
Beltronics USA, Inc. (Beltronics) (plaintiff) manufactured radar detectors and sold them to authorized distributors who agreed to resell them at specified minimum prices. Certain distributors sold Beltronics radar detectors to Midwest Inventory Distribution, LLC (Midwest) (defendant) in violation of their distribution agreements with Beltronics, and Midwest resold the detectors on eBay. To conceal the contract violations, the distributors either replaced the serial-number labels on the radar detectors with phony ones or removed the labels altogether before shipping them to Midwest. If Midwest discovered that it had received a radar detector bearing an original serial-number label, Midwest removed the label before reselling the detector. Beltronics learned that its products were being sold without original serial-number labels when it received customer requests for warranty service on merchandise with phony serial numbers. Beltronics had a policy of providing warranty coverage, software updates, and other benefits only to purchasers of Beltronics products bearing original serial-number labels. Customers who purchased Beltronics radar detectors from Midwest expressed confusion and anger because they had not received what they thought they were buying. Beltronics sued Midwest for federal trademark infringement. The district court entered a preliminary injunction barring Midwest from selling any Beltronics products not bearing an original serial-number label, and Midwest appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tacha, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.