Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Benchmark Capital Partners IV, L.P. v. Vague

Delaware Court of Chancery
2002 WL 1732423 (2002)


Facts

Benchmark Capital Partners IV, L.P. (Benchmark) (plaintiff) was the initial investor in Juniper Financial Corp. (Juniper) (defendant). Benchmark received Series A Preferred Shares. Juniper then raised additional capital by issuing Series B Preferred Shares, including some to Benchmark. Both Series A and Series B Preferred Shares were protected by provisions in Juniper’s certificate of incorporation, sometimes referred to as a charter. Relevant here, there was a protective provision saying the holders of Series A and B stock were entitled to a vote as a class before Juniper could issue any equity senior to or equal with Series A or B stock. Juniper then negotiated an additional investment from Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) (defendant) in exchange for Series C Preferred Shares. As part of this investment, CIBC obtained the right to waive the protective provision for the Series A and B stock – unless CIBC’s waiver would diminish the financial rights of the Series A and B stockholders. Then Juniper needed yet more capital funding. CIBC and Juniper agreed to a transaction that would mean: (1) merging Juniper into a subsidiary corporation, (2) adopting a new certificate of incorporation for the newly merged company, and (3) then issuing Series D Preferred Stock in exchange for an additional investment from CIBC under the new certificate of incorporation. The new, post-merger certificate of incorporation would make the Series D stock senior to both the Series A and Series B Preferred Shares and otherwise significantly devalue the Series A and Series B shares. Benchmark sued Juniper and CIBC, seeking to prevent the transaction.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Noble, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.