Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Benchmark Capital Partners IV, L.P. v. Vague

2002 WL 1732423 (Del.Ch.2002)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 30,500+ case briefs...

Benchmark Capital Partners IV, L.P. v. Vague

Delaware Court of Chancery

2002 WL 1732423 (Del.Ch.2002)

Facts

Benchmark Capital Partners IV, L.P. (Benchmark) (plaintiff) was the initial investor in Juniper Financial Corp. (Juniper) (defendant). Benchmark received Series A Preferred Shares. Juniper then raised additional capital by issuing Series B Preferred Shares, including some to Benchmark. Both Series A and Series B Preferred Shares were protected by provisions in Juniper’s certificate of incorporation, sometimes referred to as a charter. Relevant here, there was a protective provision saying the holders of Series A and B stock were entitled to a vote as a class before Juniper could issue any equity senior to or equal with Series A or B stock. Juniper then negotiated an additional investment from Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) (defendant) in exchange for Series C Preferred Shares. As part of this investment, CIBC obtained the right to waive the protective provision for the Series A and B stock – unless CIBC’s waiver would diminish the financial rights of the Series A and B stockholders. Then Juniper needed yet more capital funding. CIBC and Juniper agreed to a transaction that would mean: (1) merging Juniper into a subsidiary corporation, (2) adopting a new certificate of incorporation for the newly merged company, and (3) then issuing Series D Preferred Stock in exchange for an additional investment from CIBC under the new certificate of incorporation. The new, post-merger certificate of incorporation would make the Series D stock senior to both the Series A and Series B Preferred Shares and otherwise significantly devalue the Series A and Series B shares. Benchmark sued Juniper and CIBC, seeking to prevent the transaction.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Noble, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 551,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 30,500 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership