Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Bennion v. ANR Production Co.

Utah Supreme Court
819 P.2d 343 (Utah 1991)


Facts

Sam Bennion (plaintiff) owned an unleased mineral interest in a parcel of land in Utah. In 1971, the Utah State Board of Oil, Gas and Mining (Board) established mineral drilling units, one of which included Bennion’s property. In 1973, all of the working interest owners in the unit, with the exception of Bennion, voluntarily pooled their interests. In 1975, Bennion petitioned the Board to compel the pooling of his interests with the rest of the unit. In 1981, the Board granted Bennion’s petition (1981 Order). In 1985, the Board permitted a second well in the unit. Bennion was offered the chance to participate in the drilling of the second well, but he declined. ANR Production Co. (ANR) (defendant), the operator of the wells, petitioned the Board to modify the 1981 Order, which at the time only applied to the first well. In 1990, the Board issued an order modifying the 1981 Order by incorporating the second well into the pool and imposing a nonconsent penalty on Bennion. Specifically, the order required Bennion to pay his share of 175% of the drilling, completion, and equipment costs for the second well. Bennion appealed the Board order to the Supreme Court of Utah, arguing that the nonconsent penalty was against the public interest and an unconstitutional taking.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Durham, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.