Benzman v. Whitman
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
523 F.3d 119 (2008)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
After the events of September 11, 2001, hazardous dust (the dust) was in the air of Lower Manhattan and Brooklyn. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (defendants) told people who lived in the affected neighborhoods that the air quality was safe enough for them to return to their homes, schools, and offices. A class of people who lived, worked, or went to school near Ground Zero (collectively, the affected class) (plaintiffs) sued the EPA arguing that the EPA violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by failing to adhere to relevant regulations. Among the regulations cited by the affected class were duties imposed by the National Contingency Plan (NCP), which stated that the EPA may and should engage in postdisaster cleanup and distribute public information whenever possible and appropriate. The affected class sought an order requiring the EPA to test affected neighborhoods for hazardous substances, to clean up areas where hazardous substances were detected, and to monitor medical conditions caused by the dust. The district court dismissed the affected class’s APA claims. The affected class appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Newman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
