Bergantzel v. Mlynarik
Iowa Supreme Court
619 N.W.2d 309 (2000)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Jan Mlynarik (defendant) was injured in a car accident. Mlynarik hired Terri Bergantzel (plaintiff) to help Mlynarik settle his personal-injury claims, agreeing to pay Bergantzel a contingency fee of 15 percent for the work. Bergantzel was not licensed to practice law but offered to help Mlynarik get a lawyer if one became necessary. Bergantzel found witnesses, prepared affidavits, made phone calls, gathered Mlynarik’s medical records, obtained an opinion letter from a doctor, and negotiated with the insurance companies. As a result, the other driver’s insurance company paid Mlynarik its total policy limits of $100,000, and Mlynarik paid Bergantzel her agreed contingency fee for that recovery. However, the $100,000 payment did not cover all of Mlynarik’s injuries. Bergantzel kept working and got Mlynarik’s own insurance company to offer $35,000 under Mlynarik’s underinsured-motorist (UIM) coverage. Bergantzel told Mlynarik that he would need to hire a lawyer to get a higher UIM offer. Mlynarik hired a lawyer and eventually settled with his own insurance company for a $65,000 UIM payment. However, Mlynarik paid Bergantzel only part of her contingency fee for this recovery. Bergantzel sued Mlynarik in small-claims court to recover the $1,650 that was still not paid under her contingency-fee agreement with Mlynarik. Mlynarik’s defense was that the fee was for practicing law, and Bergantzel was not licensed to practice law. The trial court found that Bergantzel could help settle insurance claims without a law license and ordered Mlynarik to pay. The district court affirmed this ruling. The Iowa Supreme Court agreed to review the issue.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ternus, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.