Bergey v. HSBC Bank U.S.A.

2010 WL 2395506 (2010)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Bergey v. HSBC Bank U.S.A.

Ohio Court of Appeals
2010 WL 2395506 (2010)

Play video

Facts

Richard Bergey (plaintiff), through his real-estate agent, submitted a proposed purchase agreement for a house to Tracy Jones (defendant), the real-estate agent for the owner of the house, HSBC Bank, U.S.A. (HSBC) (defendant). Bergey’s offer was one of many submitted to Jones. All offers were then presented to HSBC for consideration. The highest bid was submitted by John and Susan Randolph. However, the Randolphs’ bid was contingent upon the obtaining of financing, while Bergey’s offer was for cash. Eventually, HSBC authorized Jones to accept Bergey’s cash offer for the house. Jones conveyed the news to Bergey’s real-estate agent via email and included an addendum and other instructions. Subsequently, the Randolphs informed Jones that the financing contingency could be removed from their offer. Jones relayed the information to HSBC. HSBC instructed Jones to withdraw the acceptance of Bergey’s offer and to instead accept the Randolphs’ offer. The sale was completed, and the Randolphs became the owners of the house. Bergey filed suit against HSBC and Jones for breach of and interference with contract, seeking damages, injunctive relief, and specific performance. HSBC and Jones filed motions for summary judgment. The trial court granted the motions, concluding that no breach of contract had occurred because HSBC did not actually accept Bergey’s offer, such that no contract was formed. Bergey appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Moore, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership