Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
603 F.2d 263 (1979)


Facts

Berkey Photo, Inc. (Berkey) (plaintiff) competed with Eastman Kodak Company (Kodak) (defendant) in the market for photofinishing services and the market for consumer cameras. For many years, Kodak maintained a dominant share of the market for consumer cameras and possessed a monopoly in the market for camera film. In 1972, Kodak simultaneously released the 110 camera and Kodacolor II film. The 110 camera was only compatible with Kodacolor II film, and Kodacolor II film could only be used with the 110 camera. The combination of the two products was enormously successful for Kodak, and Kodak’s competitors were unable to bring any competing products to the marketplace for many months after the release. Berkey attempted to sell a competing camera in 1973, but the camera suffered from design defects due to Berkey’s rush to compete with the 110 camera. Berkey eventually brought a lawsuit against Kodak, claiming that Kodak’s release of the 110 camera and Kodacolor II film was an impermissible use of Kodak’s monopoly power in the camera-film market to monopolize the consumer-camera market.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Kaufman, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.