Berkowitz v. Baron
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
428 F. Supp. 1190 (1977)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
On August 26, 1970, Gail and Joel Baron (defendants) sold their two clothing companies to Nathaniel Berkowitz, Edward Yaste, and Howard Hoffman (the buyers) (plaintiffs). In purchasing the companies, the buyers relied in part on the companies’ financial statement for the fiscal year ending April 30, 1970. In that financial statement, the Barons included shipping expenses as part of the companies’ manufacturing overhead. The buyers were not able to revive or maintain the companies’ business and ultimately closed the manufacturing plant on October 23, 1970. The buyers sued the Barons for securities fraud, alleging that the financial statement was materially misleading. The buyers presented expert testimony that the Barons’ inclusion of shipping expenses as manufacturing overhead did not comply with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cannella, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.