Berliner Foods Corp. v. Pillsbury Co.

633 F. Supp. 557 (1986)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
B
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Berliner Foods Corp. v. Pillsbury Co.

United States District Court for the District of Maryland
633 F. Supp. 557 (1986)

SC

Facts

Berliner Foods Corporation (Berliner) (plaintiff) was a distributor for Haagen-Dazs Ice Cream. The owner of Haagen-Dazs had orally promised Berliner that it could distribute for Haagen-Dazs as long as it met certain performance standards. The parties did not discuss or agree to any terms regarding potential assignment of the contractual rights. After the Pillsbury Company (Pillsbury) (defendant) bought Haagen-Dazs, Pillsbury sought to purchase Berliner as well. However, Berliner’s owners eventually sold their company to Dreyer’s Grand Ice Cream (Dreyer’s), a potential competitor of Pillsbury’s. Pillsbury did not consent to Berliner’s assignment of its Haagen-Dazs distribution rights to Dreyer’s and terminated the parties’ distribution relationship. Berliner sued Pillsbury, seeking enjoin the termination.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Motz, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 821,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Contracts

Key Terms