Bernhard v. Harrah's Club

16 Cal.3d 313, 128 Cal.Rptr. 215, 546 P.2d 719 (1976)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Bernhard v. Harrah’s Club

California Supreme Court
16 Cal.3d 313, 128 Cal.Rptr. 215, 546 P.2d 719 (1976)

Play video

Facts

Harrah’s Club (Harrah’s) (defendant), a Nevada gambling and drinking establishment, regularly advertised to and solicited California residents. Two such residents, Fern and Philip Myers, drove to Harrah’s on July 24, 1971. The Myers were given numerous alcoholic beverages by employees of Harrah’s, even after it was clear that they were too inebriated to drive. The Myers left Harrah’s in the early morning hours of July 25, 1971. While driving near Nevada City, California, Fern collided with a motorcyclist, Richard Bernhard (plaintiff), who was severely injured. He sued Harrah’s in a California state court on the grounds that its negligence in continuing to serve the Myers alcohol was the proximate cause of Bernhard’s injuries. Harrah’s filed a demurrer on the grounds that Nevada law applied and that under Nevada law, tavern owners did not bear civil liability for injuries caused by their intoxicated patrons. The trial court agreed with Harrah’s and dismissed the case. Bernhard appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sullivan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership