Bernhardt v. Pfizer, Inc.

2000 WL 1738645 (2000)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Bernhardt v. Pfizer, Inc.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2000 WL 1738645 (2000)

Facts

Lawrence D. Bernhardt and Arnold Liebman (plaintiffs), users of Cardura, the brand-named drug for antihypertensive doxazosin, sued its manufacturer, Pfizer, Inc. (defendant), for products liability. Bernhardt and Liebman sought an injunction ordering Pfizer to notify Cardura users and their physicians about the results of a National Institute of Health (NIH) study questioning the efficacy of doxazosin versus the widely used diuretic drug chlorthalidone to reduce some forms of cardiovascular disease. Bernhardt and Liebman sought the injunction in their motion for judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McKenna, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership