Berry v. City of Detroit

25 F.3d 1342 (1994)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Berry v. City of Detroit

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
25 F.3d 1342 (1994)

SC

Facts

Lee Berry Jr. (Lee) was shot and killed by a police officer for the City of Detroit (defendant). Doris Berry (Berry) (plaintiff), Lee’s mother, sued the city for wrongful death. Berry asserted that the city had a policy of failing to train or discipline its officers in the appropriate use of deadly force. At trial, Berry called Frederick Postill as an expert witness to testify that this policy and these failures proximately caused Lee’s death. Postill’s qualifications discussed at trial included his sociology degree, his master’s degree in education, his appointment as a deputy sheriff, his election as a sheriff, and his work at the Justice Department developing sheriff-training criteria. Postill was fired twice as deputy sheriff, which ultimately led to his bid to be elected as sheriff. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Berry. The city appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Guy Jr., J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership