Berry v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
256 Cal. Rptr. 344 , 208 Cal. App. 3d 783 (1989)
Michael Berry (defendant) owned a pit bull named Willy. Berry purchased Willy as a fighting dog from a breeder of fighting dogs. The breeder told Berry that Willy was a fighting dog and had good gameness and wind and an exceptionally hard bite. Berry lived next to the Soto family, who had four young children. Berry and the Soto family shared a driveway. Berry referred to Willy as a killer dog and told the Soto family that the dog was behind a fence. However, the fence was not a full enclosure, and anyone could get to the area on the side of Berry’s home where Willy was chained. Through that area, Berry was growing almost 250 marijuana plants. James Soto was two-and-a-half years old. When his mother went inside for a minute and left James playing on their patio, James wandered into Berry’s yard. The family then discovered Willy attacking James. James died from his injuries. Before this attack, Willy had not ever attacked a person. The State of California (plaintiff) charged Berry with involuntary manslaughter and other crimes. The prosecution also considered charging Berry with second-degree murder after the preliminary hearing. During the preliminary hearing, the prosecution presented testimony from an animal control officer qualified as an expert on fighting dogs. The officer testified that pit bull dogs have been selectively bred to be aggressive and can attack without warning. The officer also testified that pit bull dogs can attack in unpredictable circumstances. The trial court determined that probable cause existed to continue the criminal case, and Berry filed a petition to review this finding.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Agliano, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.