Berry v. Time Insurance Co.
United States District Court for the District of South Dakota
798 F.Supp.2d 1015 (2011)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
Berry (plaintiff) purchased a nursing home insurance policy from Time Insurance Company (Time) (defendant). The policy is administered by Hancock (defendant). Under the policy, Time was required to pay for Berry’s alternate care if Berry, Berry’s doctor, and Time agreed upon an alternate healthcare plan. In September 2008, Berry had an accident and was thereafter in need of home healthcare assistance in order to remain in her home. Hancock informed Berry that her policy would only pay for alternate care if provided by a licensed home healthcare provider. Berry subsequently learned that her state did not license home healthcare providers. When Berry found an unlicensed home healthcare provider, her doctor contacted Hancock to request coverage. Hancock refused, although Berry’s policy itself did not require that Berry’s home healthcare provider be licensed. Berry brought a breach of contract claim against the defendants. The defendants brought a motion to dismiss Berry’s complaint, arguing that because a condition precedent had not been fulfilled, namely an agreement as to an alternate home healthcare plan, the contract was unenforceable.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Schreier, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.