Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Bery v. New York

97 F.3d 689 (1996)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 28,500+ case briefs...

Bery v. New York

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

97 F.3d 689 (1996)

Facts

Pursuant to its general-vendors law, New York City prohibited visual artists from exhibiting or selling their works in public places without general-vendors licenses. The city exempted vendors of newspapers, books, and other written material from its licensing requirement. The total number of general-vendors licenses was limited to 853 at a time. Waiting times to receive licenses were three to five years. However, all veterans automatically qualified for licenses and were not subject to the limit. Also, the city placed no limit on the number of vendors of written material. The city’s administrative code restricted the placement, location, and size of vending displays of all licensed general vendors and vendors of written material. Individual artists (plaintiffs) who produced works of visual art like paintings and sculptures had been arrested or harassed by police for displaying and selling their art without a general-vendors license. They claimed that street marketing and the opportunity to share their art in public with people who would otherwise never visit a museum or gallery was an important aspect of their expression. Robert Bery and Robert Lederman (plaintiffs) filed separate actions against the city in which they each sought a preliminary injunction to enjoin enforcement of the general-vendors law’s licensing requirement as an unconstitutional restriction of freedom of expression. The district court denied both motions. The court found that the general-vendors law was a content-neutral regulation intended to deal with street congestion and public safety and that visual arts were less protected than political or religious speech. Bery, Lederman, and the other artists appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Carter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 545,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 28,500 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership