Best Lock v. Ilco Unican
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
94 F.3d 1563 (1996)
- Written by Jody Stuart, JD
Facts
Best Lock Corporation (Best) (plaintiff) owned a design patent for a key blade, the portion of a key inserted into a lock’s keyway. Best also owned a design patent for the corresponding keyway. Ilco Unican (Ilco) (defendant) copied Best’s patented key-blade design, and Best sued Ilco in federal district court for patent infringement. The district court held that Best’s key-blade design patent was invalid, finding that the shape of the key blade was dictated by its function. Best appealed, asserting that although a particular key and its corresponding lock must match to operate the lock, an unlimited number of key-blade and corresponding keyway designs were available. Therefore, Best argued, the key blade could have many different shapes and was not dictated solely by function. The parties did not dispute that the key blade at issue must be designed as shown in the patent in order to perform its intended function, fitting into its corresponding lock’s keyway.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lourie, J.)
Dissent (Newman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.