Bethany Pharmacal Co. v. QVC, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
241 F.3d 854 (2001)
QVC, Inc. (defendant) held trade shows to select vendors to sell products on QVC broadcasts. QVC also selected alternate vendors, in the event that a scheduled vendor could not participate in a broadcast. QVC contracted with Roberta Janis, an employee of the Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs, to assist in selecting vendors. QVC gave Janis solicitations to send to vendors, which included an information sheet with a disclaimer that any product sales from the vendor to QVC would be governed by a QVC purchase order. The purchase order would be the only valid contract between QVC and the vendor. Bethany Pharmacal Co. (Bethany) (plaintiff) received a solicitation packet with the disclaimer and attended the trade show. After the trade show, Janis sent letters to the selected vendors and alternates on Department of Commerce letterhead. Janis directed her subordinates to attach a post-it note with the word “alternate” to the letters sent to alternate vendors. Bethany was selected as an alternate, but the letter Bethany received did not include a post-it note. Based on the letter, Bethany purchased $100,000 in skin-care products to sell on the QVC broadcast. When QVC learned of Janis’s mistake, QVC notified Bethany but did not change Bethany’s status from alternate to participant. Bethany filed a breach of contract suit against QVC. The court granted QVC’s motion for summary judgment and found that Janis was not an agent of QVC. Bethany appealed the award of summary judgment in favor of QVC.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Ripple, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.