Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,800+ case briefs...

Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Turner Construction Co.

New York Court of Appeals
141 N.E.2d 590, 2 N.Y.2d 456 (1957)


Facts

Bethlehem Steel Company (plaintiff) subcontracted to provide, erect, and paint the structural steel for a building that Turner Construction Company (defendant) built for Mutual Life Insurance Company. Mutual agreed to pay the costs of materials. The contract set the steel price at $182 per ton but contained a price-adjustment, or escalator, clause stating: “The price or prices herein stated are based on prices for component materials, labor rates applicable to the fabrication and erection thereof and freight rates, in effect as of the date of this proposal. If, at any time prior to completion of performance of the work to be performed hereunder, any of said material prices, labor rates and/or freight rates shall be increased or decreased, then in respect of any of said work performed thereafter there shall be a corresponding increase or decrease in the prices herein stated.” The contract limited the maximum adjustment for increases in steel prices to $15 per ton. Bethlehem uniformly increased the prices it charged for steel items produced at its mill, such as steel bars and sheets, by $10 per ton before the contract was signed. Once construction began, Bethlehem invoiced Mutual periodically for steel furnished in accordance with the contract, including the $10 increase. Mutual objected, arguing that “prices for component materials” referred to changes in prices that Bethlehem paid for raw materials such as iron ore and steel scrap. Bethlehem insisted that the term meant prices regularly charged to the trade for manufactured steel items, ultimately billing Mutual nearly $95,000. Mutual and Turner refused to pay. Bethlehem filed a lien against the building and filed for foreclosure. Mutual’s controller testified he understood the provision to refer to increases in the price of raw materials, not manufactured steel items. But the trial judge granted summary judgment for Bethlehem based on the contract language, and the appellate court affirmed. Turner appealed to New York’s highest court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dye, J.)

Dissent (Conway, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 498,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 498,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial