Bevan v. Fix
Wyoming Supreme Court
42 P.3d 1013 (2002)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Attorney William Fix (defendant) represented Steven Bevan (plaintiff) on a criminal charge of committing domestic violence against Bevan’s then-girlfriend Jenni Jones. Two years later, Bevan and Jones were married. Bevan and Jones shared two children, Brittany and Steven. Jones later filed for divorce from Bevan. Initially, Fix represented Jones in the divorce, but he later withdrew as her attorney because he had begun a sexual relationship with her. After the divorce was finalized, Fix invited Jones, Brittany, Steven, and two babysitters to spend the night at his house. During the night, Fix assaulted Jones, choking and beating her severely. According to Jones, Steven, Brittany, and the babysitters saw part of the assault. Brittany’s later testimony made it unclear what she saw, but she clearly heard the assault. After the incident, both children exhibited behavioral issues and were diagnosed as being in significant distress with psychological disorders. Bevan sued Fix. The lawsuit included an intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress (IIED) claim on the children’s behalf, based on Fix’s assault of Jones. Bevan also brought his own legal-malpractice claim, arguing that Fix had committed malpractice by representing Jones in a divorce against Bevan, his former client. The trial court granted summary judgment for Fix on both claims, ruling that (1) a single incident of domestic violence could not be extreme and outrageous enough for an IIED claim, (2) Fix had not owed Bevan any duties after the criminal matter ended, and (3) Bevan had not identified any damages caused by Fix’s alleged legal malpractice. Bevan appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lehman, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.