Beynon Building Corp. v. National Guardian Life Insurance Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
455 N.E.2d 246 (1983)
- Written by Megan Schwarz, JD
Facts
Beynon Building Corporation (Beynon) (plaintiff) and Rockford Mortgage Company executed a mortgage and a note on October 23, 1964. The mortgage was for $85,000 and the installment note stated that it was payable in 180 monthly installments at $649.60. The interest was 5½ percent. The mortgage and note were assigned to National Guardian Life Insurance Company (National) (defendant). Beynon claims that in 1965, Beynon received a new installment schedule from National indicating that at $649.60 the correct amount of installments would actually be 200 monthly payments. Beynon never confirmed this with National. In September 1979, after 180 payments, Beynon asked to be released from the mortgage. National refused saying that National just realized a mistake had been made and the correct amount for each monthly payment should have been $694.60. Beynon sued asking to be released from the mortgage. National asserted that a mutual mistake had been made. Beynon claimed that National’s mutual mistake defense was barred by the ten-year statute of limitations reasoning that National had knowledge of the mistake in 1965 when National sent Beynon the updated installment schedule and failed to act on that knowledge. National argued that they did not become aware of the mistake until Beynon’s last payment. The trial court held for National reasoning that a mutual mistake had been made and the statute of limitations was not a bar.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Unverzagt, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.