BH ex rel. Hawk v. Easton Area School District
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
725 F.3d 293 (2013)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
A breast-cancer foundation launched a breast-cancer-awareness campaign with the slogan “I ♥ boobies.” The motivation behind the irreverent slogan was to encourage young people to break perceived taboos surrounding conversations about breast cancer. BH (plaintiff), a student at an Easton Area School District (district) (defendant) middle school, embraced the campaign and, along with several classmates, began wearing bracelets with the slogan to school. Several faculty members expressed reservations about the bracelets to school administrators, even though the bracelets had not caused any disruptions. The administration agreed to ban the bracelets, and the decision was announced over the school public-address system by the seventh-grade assistant principal. The assistant principal used the term boobies while making the announcement. Later, BH and two classmates chose to wear the bracelets during the school’s observance of Breast Cancer Awareness Day. BH and a classmate refused to remove the bracelets when asked, and the school suspended them. The district then issued a district-wide ban of the bracelets. BH sued the district, claiming violation of her right to free expression under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of BH, and the district appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

