Bi v. Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
984 F.2d 582 (1993)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
The Bhopal disaster was a chemical accident that occurred in Bhopal, India, at a Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) plant. UCIL was a subsidiary of the United States company Union Carbide (defendant). The Indian government, pursuant to standing conferred by the Bhopal Act, passed by the India legislature, brought a suit in Indian court against UCIL on behalf of those injured in the disaster. The India Supreme Court approved a $470-million-dollar settlement to be paid by UCIL to the injured. Following the settlement, two class actions were filed in Texas state court by the injured (plaintiffs) seeking compensation from Union Carbide for injuries sustained in the Bhopal disaster. The class representatives asserted that the Indian court settlement was inadequate, and the Indian government, as UCIL, had a conflict of interest in negotiating the settlement. The cases were removed to federal court before a multidistrict litigation panel transferred the cases to the southern district of New York. The district judge dismissed the claims based on forum non conveniens. The plaintiffs appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Newman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.