Bianca Lucrecia v. Samuel Samples, et al.

1995 WL 630016 (1995)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Bianca Lucrecia v. Samuel Samples, et al.

United States District Court for the Northern District of California
1995 WL 630016 (1995)

Facts

Bianca Lucrecia (plaintiff) was a transgender woman. In January 1986, during Lucrecia’s transition, she was sentenced to 10 years in federal prison. Lucrecia was initially assigned to a coed prison in California. She resided in the male section of the prison but was permitted to wear female clothing and use female amenities. In 1990, Lucrecia was transferred to another coed prison in Kentucky and lived in the female section. In 1991, Lucrecia was transferred to the Federal Prison Camp in Boron, California (Boron), a lower security all-male facility. There, Lucrecia roomed with three men, was not permitted to wear female undergarments, and was harassed, assaulted, and abused by other inmates and prison officials. Lucrecia filed a complaint with Larry Taylor (defendant), the warden of Boron, who denied Lucrecia’s request to be treated as a woman. Lucrecia then sent a letter to Samuel Samples (defendant), the western regional director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, complaining of the unlawful conduct by Boron prison staff. The letter was forwarded to Taylor, who did not act regarding it. Lucrecia filed suit, alleging, among other things, violation of her right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment, against Taylor; Samples; T. McAfee (defendant), the associate warden at Boron; and Captain James Earp (defendant), an officer at Boron (collectively, the prison officials); as well as 20 Doe parties. The prison officials and Doe parties moved for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Walker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership