Bianca Lucrecia v. Samuel Samples, et al.
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
1995 WL 630016 (1995)

- Written by Caitlinn Raimo, JD
Facts
Bianca Lucrecia (plaintiff) was a transgender woman. In January 1986, during Lucrecia’s transition, she was sentenced to 10 years in federal prison. Lucrecia was initially assigned to a coed prison in California. She resided in the male section of the prison but was permitted to wear female clothing and use female amenities. In 1990, Lucrecia was transferred to another coed prison in Kentucky and lived in the female section. In 1991, Lucrecia was transferred to the Federal Prison Camp in Boron, California (Boron), a lower security all-male facility. There, Lucrecia roomed with three men, was not permitted to wear female undergarments, and was harassed, assaulted, and abused by other inmates and prison officials. Lucrecia filed a complaint with Larry Taylor (defendant), the warden of Boron, who denied Lucrecia’s request to be treated as a woman. Lucrecia then sent a letter to Samuel Samples (defendant), the western regional director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, complaining of the unlawful conduct by Boron prison staff. The letter was forwarded to Taylor, who did not act regarding it. Lucrecia filed suit, alleging, among other things, violation of her right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment, against Taylor; Samples; T. McAfee (defendant), the associate warden at Boron; and Captain James Earp (defendant), an officer at Boron (collectively, the prison officials); as well as 20 Doe parties. The prison officials and Doe parties moved for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Walker, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.