Bible v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.
New York Court of Appeals
176 N.E. 838 (1931)
- Written by Noah Lewis, JD
Facts
Anna Bible was a patient in a state psychiatric hospital due to manic depressive psychosis. An agent of the John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company (John Hancock) (defendant) visited her in the hospital and sold her two $400 life insurance policies payable on her death to her husband, Wacil Bible (plaintiff). The agent delivered Anna and Wacil the policy, and for three months thereafter, he collected the weekly premium until another agent began collecting the premium. About 20 months after the policies were purchased, Anna died. Wacil filed a claim with John Hancock that included the condition of her health at the time that the policies were purchased. John Hancock denied liability on the grounds that two health-related conditions had been breached. First, the policy was not to take effect unless upon the date of issuance the insured was alive and in sound health. Second, the policy was void if the insured was hospitalized or attended any “institution of any kind engaged in the care or cure of human health or disease, or has been attended by any physician, within two years before the date hereof, for any serious disease, complaint or operation,” unless such incidents were waived by endorsements appended to the plan. Further, waivers or alterations could not be authorized by agents and must have been in writing and signed by certain high-level employees. There was no such written waiver. Wacil sued. A jury found in Wacil’s favor, which the appellate court affirmed. John Hancock appealed again.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cardozo, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.