Bible v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
799 F.3d 633 (2015)
- Written by Sheri Dennis, JD
Facts
Bryana Bible (plaintiff) obtained a student loan. The loan agreement incorporated the provisions of the Higher Education Act (HEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Bible subsequently defaulted on the loan for the first time. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. (United) (defendant), the guarantor of the loan, repaid the loan and entered into a rehabilitation agreement within 60 days with Bible for reduced monthly payments. Bible timely complied with the terms of the rehabilitation agreement, but United charged her over $4,000 in collection fees. Bible sued United for breach of contract, claiming that United was prohibited from charging her collection fees because she timely entered into a rehabilitation agreement and complied with the terms of the agreement. The district court granted United’s motion to dismiss on the ground that Bible’s claims were preempted by the HEA, which does not provide a private cause of action. Alternatively, the district court concluded that Bible’s complaint failed to state a claim because the HEA specifically permits the collection of costs from a borrower who defaults on a loan. Bible appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hamilton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.