Biddle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
United States Supreme Court
302 U.S. 573, 58 S. Ct. 379, 82 L. Ed. 431 (1938)

- Written by Joe Cox, JD
Facts
Biddle (plaintiff) was an American taxpayer who received cash dividends from stock in British corporations. This suit was a consolidation of multiple similar cases. British corporations paid the taxes on such dividends at the point of profits, meaning the British corporation itself either paid or at least was responsible for paying the normal rate taxes. A surtax was then charged to individuals whose income exceeded a certain amount. In such cases, the British entity then sent a statement indicating the gross amount from which the taxes appropriate were deducted, the rate and amount of income tax appropriate to that gross amount, and the net amount paid. The British corporations had the right to either subtract the tax before distribution or declare a dividend free of tax, in which case the taxpayer was shown the tax appropriate for the dividend and paid that remaining amount. The mechanics of this were to allow taxpayers not subject to the surtax to claim a rebate. Biddle included the sums reported in the British returns in his gross income. Biddle then claimed as credit the amount of British tax appropriate to the dividends and the amount of surtax paid. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the commissioner) (defendant) assessed a deficiency against this practice. The commissioner argued that the tax appropriate was not actually the amount of income taxes paid by the taxpayer but rather by the corporation and thus must not be credited as taxes paid. Biddle argued that the nature of British taxation essentially meant that he should be allowed to credit the tax appropriate to the dividend, or if not, Biddle must at least be able to offset his gross income by this amount.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stone, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.