Biden v. Nebraska
United States Supreme Court
143 S. Ct. 2355 (2023)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
In March 2020, the United States president declared that the COVID-19 pandemic was a national emergency. The secretary of education (secretary) at the time suspended loan repayments and interest accrual for all federally held student loans, pursuant to the secretary’s authority under the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act (HEROES Act). Congress also enacted a law that required the secretary to extend the suspensions through the end of September 2020. In August 2022, when the pandemic was nearly over, the current secretary of education under President Joe Biden (defendants) sought to implement a comprehensive student-loan-forgiveness program. The program would cancel about $430 billion of federal-student-loan balances for 20 million borrowers and materially lower the balances of 23 million other borrowers. The program would have a significant impact on the American economy. Several states (plaintiffs) sued members of the Biden administration (defendants), arguing that the loan-cancellation plan was not authorized under the HEROES Act. The United States Supreme Court agreed to review the matter.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, C.J.)
Concurrence (Barrett, J.)
Dissent (Kagan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.