Big Creek Lumber Co. v. County of Santa Cruz et al.
California Supreme Court
38 Cal. 4th 1139 (2006)

- Written by Colette Routel, JD
Facts
In 1999, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Cruz (county) (defendant) enacted ordinances restricting timber harvesting and supporting helicopter operations to certain areas, while also explicitly precluding timber operations near waterways and residences. The California Coastal Commission certified these ordinances as amendments to the county’s local coastal program. Not long thereafter, Big Creek Lumber Company, Homer McCray, and a nonprofit organization (collectively, Big Creek) (plaintiffs) sued the county and the California Coastal Commission, alleging that these ordinances were preempted by state statutes, including the Forest Practice Act (FPA) and the Timberland Productivity Act (TPA). The trial court found certain provisions of the ordinances preempted. Both parties appealed, and the court of appeals held that the county’s newly enacted ordinances were preempted by state law in their entirety. The California Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Werdegar, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.