Big O Tire Dealers, Inc. v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

561 F.2d 1365 (1977)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
B
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Big O Tire Dealers, Inc. v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
561 F.2d 1365 (1977)

SC
Play video

Facts

Big O Tire Dealers, Inc. (Big O) (plaintiff) had tire dealerships in 14 states. In 1973 Big O began manufacturing tires it called the Big O Big Foots. Subsequently, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Goodyear) (defendant) launched a nationwide advertising campaign using the word “Bigfoot” in the sale of its tires. Goodyear’s Bigfoot advertising campaign cost $9,690,029. Big O brought suit against Goodyear for trademark infringement. The jury found infringement and awarded Big O $2.8 million in compensatory damages, which corresponded to Goodyear’s nationwide advertising budget, reduced by the percentage of states in which Big O did business (.28*$9,690,029). Goodyear appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lewis, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 783,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 783,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 783,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Intellectual Property
Torts
Trademark

Key Terms