Bigelow v. Burnham
Iowa Supreme Court
49 N.W. 104 (1891)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
Rollin Burnham (defendant) signed a note promising to pay Rufus Burnham or the bearer of the note approximately $1,858 plus 7 percent interest. The note was dated May 2, 1885, and contained the following language: “Storm Lake, Buena Vista Co., Iowa.” The note was signed and delivered in New York, where Rufus lived. Rollin lived in Storm Lake, Iowa. The record contained no evidence regarding the indebtedness that the note was intended to repay. When Eveline Bigelow (plaintiff) sued Rollin seeking repayment of the note, Rollin responded that New York law governed and that the note was invalid because the note’s 7 percent interest term constituted usury in New York. Bigelow responded that Iowa law governed and that the note’s interest was legal under Iowa law. The lower court entered judgment for Rollin. Bigelow appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Beck, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.