Bill Strong Enterprises, Inc. v. Shannon
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
49 F.3d 1541 (1995)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Bill Strong Enterprises, Inc. (BSE) (plaintiff) entered into a fixed-price contract with the Department of the Army (government) (defendant) to renovate Air Force housing units. During the performance period, BSE notified the government that housing units were being released to BSE out of sequence, resulting in significant delays and cost overruns. BSE submitted price and cost data at the government’s request. The government did not dispute BSE’s demand for additional compensation to account for the delay-driven cost overruns. The government instructed the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) to audit BSE cost claims. During the audit, BSE completed all contract work. To properly address DCAA’s information requests, BSE hired Excell, Inc., a consulting firm, to review and analyze BSE’s data and prepare a request for an equitable adjustment to submit to the government. BSE’s request included approximately $200,000 in consulting costs for Excell’s work. The government and BSE reached a settlement regarding the delay costs; however, the government denied BSE’s request for reimbursement of Excell’s consultant fees. BSE appealed to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (Board). The Board affirmed, holding that BSE was not entitled to recover Excell’s consultant costs because those costs were incurred (1) after the completion of all contracted work; and (2) in connection with the prosecution of claims against the government. BSE appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Clevenger, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.