Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

Bindrim v. Mitchell

Court of Appeal of California for the Second District
92 Cal.App.3d 61 (1979)


Facts

Dr. Paul Bindrim (plaintiff), a psychologist, ran nude group therapy sessions, seeking to have participants shed their psychological inhibitions. Gwen Davis Mitchell (defendant), a novelist, enrolled in one of the sessions, claiming that she was there for the therapy only. Subsequently, she contracted with Doubleday (defendant) to write a book based on the nude therapy technique. She used a fake name for the doctor that conducted the sessions in her book. However, although the name and appearance of the doctor in her book was different from Bindrim, the character was otherwise similar to Bindrim. In fact, Bindrim was identified as the character by several witnesses. Bindrim brought libel suits against Mitchell and Doubleday. The jury returned a verdict for Bindrim, but the court granted a motion for a new trial conditioned on Bindrim accepting a remittitur. Both Bindrim and Mitchell and Doubleday appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kingsley, J.)

Concurrence (Jefferson, J.)

Dissent (Files, P.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.