Biondi v. Beekman Hill House Apartment Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
731 N.E.2d 577 (2000)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
Simone Demou was a shareholder in the Beekman Hill House Apartment Corporation (Beekman) (defendant), a residential co-op. Demou sought to sublet her unit to Gregory Broome, a Black man. Broome was financially eligible, but his application was denied by Nicholas Biondi (plaintiff), Beekman’s president, and the rest of the Beekman board after Biondi learned that Broome was Black. Demou and Broome sued Biondi and Beekman for violating state and federal civil-rights laws. The jury awarded Demou and Broome both compensatory and punitive damages. The trial court additionally found that Biondi and the Beekman board had acted in bad faith toward Demou and Broome and that their actions were not in the best interest of the co-op. While the case was pending appeal, the parties reached a settlement whereby Biondi agreed to pay a reduced amount of punitive damages. Biondi then sought indemnification from Beekman. Beekman sought to dismiss Biondi’s indemnification claim, arguing that public policy forbade indemnification for punitive damages. The trial court denied Beekman’s motion. The appellate division reversed, finding that (1) Biondi was seeking indemnification for punitive damages, which was against public policy; and (2) Biondi was seeking indemnification for actions conducted in bad faith in violation of Business Corporation Law (BCL) § 721. Biondi appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ciparick, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.