Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank, P.C. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
949 P.2d 1, 17 Cal.4th 119, 70 Cal.Rptr.2d 304, 525 U.S. 920 (1998)
- Written by Richard Lavigne, JD
Facts
The New York based law firm of Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank, P.C. (Birbrower) (plaintiff) entered into a fee agreement with ESQ, a corporation based in California. The fee agreement related to a dispute between ESQ and another company headquartered in California. The fee agreement declared that it should be governed by the laws of California. Birbrower was not licensed to practice law in the state of California. Birbrower performed some work under the agreement from the firm’s New York office. However, the bulk of the work involved lawyers with Birbrower traveling to California for meetings, negotiations, and preparation for private arbitration proceedings. After the relationship between Birbrower and ESQ broke down, ESQ sued Birbrower for malpractice, alleging that Birbrower had engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. Birbrower counterclaimed to enforce its fee agreement. The California superior court held the fee agreement unenforceable on the ground that Birbrower had participated in the unauthorized practice of law. Birbrower appealed, and the state appellate court upheld the superior court decision. Birbrower petitioned the Supreme Court of California for review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Chin, J.)
Dissent (Kennard, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 797,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.