Bishop v. Eaton
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
37 N.E. 665 (1894)
- Written by Matt Fyock, JD
Facts
Bishop (plaintiff) was a business associate of Frank Eaton’s (defendant) brother, Harry. Bishop and Harry Eaton lived in Illinois, and Frank Eaton lived in Nova Scotia. In December 1886, Frank Eaton wrote a letter to Bishop that said, "If Harry needs more money, let him have it, or assist him to get it, and I will see that it is paid." In 1887, Harry Eaton signed a promissory note for $200 to Stark, payable in one year. Bishop signed the note as surety, relying on Frank Eaton’s letter for reimbursement if called upon to pay the note. Bishop mailed Frank Eaton a letter saying he had signed the note, but Frank Eaton never received it. When payment was due in 1889, Bishop asked Frank Eaton to pay the note. Eaton replied, "Try to get Harry to pay it. If he don't [sic], I will. It shall not cost you anything." In 1891, Bishop paid the note and brought suit against Eaton. The court ruled for Bishop. Eaton appealed the ruling.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Knowlton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.