Bitter v. United States
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 15 (1967)
Bitter (defendant) was on trial for multiple federal charges. The United States (plaintiff) rested its case earlier than expected and Bitter asked permission to leave the courtroom to retrieve evidence from his office. The court granted a 45 minute recess. Bitter returned to court 37 minutes late. The trial judge ordered Bitter to be held in custody for the remainder of the trial. Bitter was incarcerated in a jail 40 miles away from the courthouse. After being convicted of multiple charges, Bitter appealed the conviction directly to the Supreme Court on grounds that his detention was unjustified and materially interfered with his right to the representation of counsel.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.