From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
Bjork v. Draper
Illinois Appellate Court
886 N.E.2d 563 (2008)
J. Douglas Gray and Karen Gray owned two lots in Lake Forest. The property was in a historic neighborhood, and the Grays granted a conservation easement to the Lake Forest Open Lands Association. Regarding Lot 2, the conservation easement stated that its purpose was to assure that the property will be retained forever predominantly in its scenic and open-space condition, as lawn and landscaped grounds. The easement prohibited the placement or construction of any buildings whatsoever, or other structures or improvements of any kind on the property. The easement stated that it could only be altered or varied by agreement of both parties or their successors. The easement also stated that it could only be terminated or extinguished, whether in whole or in part, by judicial proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction. The Grays sold Lots 1 and 2 to John and Liz Draper (defendants). The Drapers decided to install a driveway turnaround on Lot 1 that partially encroached onto Lot 2. The Drapers also decided to change a portion of the landscaping. The Drapers and the Association entered into two amendments of the conservation easement to permit these changes, and the Drapers then installed the driveway turnaround and made the changes. John and Stephanie Bjork and other neighbors (plaintiffs) then sued the Drapers and the Association, alleging that the amendments to the conservation easement were invalid. The trial court determined that the amendments did not materially impair the purposes of the conservation easement and were not otherwise contrary to applicable law or public policy. The plaintiffs appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Johnson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 619,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 619,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.