Black v. Village of Park Forest

20 F. Supp. 2d 1218 (1998)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Black v. Village of Park Forest

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
20 F. Supp. 2d 1218 (1998)

  • Written by Jack Newell, JD

Facts

Debra Taylor (plaintiff) was a resident of the Village of Park Forest (the village) (defendant). The village had a policy of performing regular inspections of the interiors of single-family homes that were not owner occupied. The village claimed properties that were not owner occupied had higher rates of code violations. The village also performed exterior inspections of multifamily homes and common-area searches of apartment buildings. The village contacted Taylor’s landlord to arrange for a town inspector to come by and inspect Taylor’s single-family home. The landlord refused to allow an inspection. The inspector came to the house when no one was home and left a note that a search warrant had been issued. The village then petitioned for Taylor and her landlord to be held in contempt of court in the Cook County Circuit Court. Taylor and a group of other residents sued in federal district court, challenging the constitutionality of the village’s residential-inspection policy under the Fourth Amendment. The village claimed that its inspections were administrative searches, and so the searches could be conducted as long as they were governed by reasonable standards.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gottschall, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership