Blake v. Commissioner
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
697 F.2d 473 (1982)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
S. Prestley Blake (plaintiff) was a cofounder of the Friendly Ice Cream Corporation (Friendly’s). Blake owned a yacht but wanted to get rid of it due to the expense and hassle of the upkeep. Blake agreed to donate the yacht to Kings Point Fund, Inc. (the fund), a charitable organization. Minutes from a meeting of the fund’s board of directors at which the donation was discussed stated that further negotiations regarding the donation were forthcoming. Soon after, Blake transferred 35,000 shares of Friendly’s stock to the fund. In Blake’s possession, the stock had an adjusted tax basis of $98. In the fund’s possession, the stock was worth $686,875. Upon receiving the stock, the fund sold it for over $700,000. A portion of those funds were then used to buy Blake’s yacht for $675,000. Soon after, the fund sold the yacht for $250,000. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) determined for tax purposes that the transactions would constitute a contribution of the yacht to the fund and a sale of the stock. Accordingly, the IRS assessed capital gains on Blake for the value above $98 he gained from the transactions. The United States Tax Court affirmed, holding that the transactions were linked and should be construed for tax purposes as a sale of the Friendly’s stock and a contribution of the yacht. Blake appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Oakes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.