United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
407 F.2d 908 (1969)
Blake (defendant) came from a well-to-do family, completed two years of college and briefly served in the Navy until he was given a medical discharge after suffering an epileptic seizure. The following year, Blake underwent electroshock therapy for the first time and subsequently was hospitalized for psychiatric treatment. Over the next 20 years, Blake required extensive psychiatric care including inpatient hospitalization and electroshock treatment. He was also a heavy drinker and drug user during this time. In his 30s, Blake was twice judged to be incompetent and hospitalized in mental institutions for periods of six months. He also had several failed marriages and sporadic periods of employment. Blake served a brief prison sentence when his probation was revoked for shooting his second wife because of a separate charge of aggravated assault. While staying at a hotel in Jacksonville, Florida, Blake had a hotel employee drive him to a local bar where he had several drinks and told a waitress that he would be back later with a large sum of money. The hotel employee then drove Blake to a bank with which he had a long-standing dispute. Blake walked into the bank during rush hour, demanded money, obtained it, and walked out. The following day, Blake was arrested and charged with bank robbery under 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113. Six months later, Blake was convicted of the crime after a jury trial where his principal defense was insanity at the time of the commission of the robbery. Blake appealed, arguing that the definition of insanity given to the jury for determining whether he was not guilty by reason of insanity was outmoded and prejudicial.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bell, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 236,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.