Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Blakeley v. Gorin

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
313 N.E.2d 903 (Mass. 1974)


Facts

Blakeley et. al. (plaintiffs) owned two parcels of land that were separated by an alley. One parcel was a Ritz-Carlton hotel and the other was vacant, but the plaintiffs planned to construct a hotel-apartment building on the vacant lot and connect it to the Ritz-Carlton via a 12-story bridge over the alley. Gorin et. al. (defendants) owned an apartment building next to the plaintiffs’ vacant lot. The properties shared the same alley. About half of the apartments in the defendants’ building received their natural light and air from windows facing the alley. Each of the properties in this case is subject to the restriction that the common alley must “be kept open.” The restriction was put in place when the neighborhood was mostly single family residences, but since that time, many of the small residences have been replaced by high-rise apartments and hotels. Blakeley filed suit seeking a declaratory judgment that the restrictions were obsolete and no longer enforceable. The Massachusetts Superior Court ruled that the restrictions were obsolete and that Gorin et. al. were entitled to only nominal damages. Gorin appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Hennessey, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Quirico, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 173,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.