Blakeslee v. Platt Brothers & Co.
Connecticut Supreme Court
902 A.2d 620 (2006)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Michael Blakeslee, Jr. (plaintiff) was employed by Platt Brothers & Co. (Platt) (defendant). On February 13, 2002, Blakeslee suffered a grand mal seizure at work and lost consciousness. When Blakeslee regained consciousness, he began flailing his arms and legs. Three of Blakeslee’s coworkers tried to pin Blakeslee to the floor to keep him from injuring himself or other workers. When Blakeslee tried to break free from his coworkers’ restraints, he dislocated both of his shoulders. Blakeslee’s injuries required surgery, and the orthopedic surgeon concluded that Blakeslee’s injuries were caused by the coworkers’ restraints and not by the seizure. Blakeslee sought workers’-compensation benefits from Platt. A workers’-compensation commissioner dismissed Blakeslee’s application for benefits after concluding that Blakeslee’s injuries did not arise out of his employment. The workers’-compensation review board affirmed the commissioner’s decision, and Blakeslee appealed to the Connecticut Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Borden, J.)
Dissent (Sullivan, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.