United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
359 F.Supp. 1260 (1973)
Following several complaints made by female professional golfers, the Ladies Professional Golf Association (LPGA) (defendant) tournament director appointed four observers to watch golfer Jane Blalock (plaintiff) play during a May 1972 tournament in Louisville, Kentucky. After watching Blalock, the observers agreed that she moved her ball on several occasions, including advancing her ball on the green after she had cleaned it. The Tour Executive Board, comprised of five LPGA players, found Blalock guilty of cheating during play, fined her $500, and placed her on probation for the rest of the season, later changed to a full year. Blalock filed suit against the LPGA, alleging an illegal group boycott in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act. Blalock filed a motion for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Moye, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.