Blanchard v. Bergeron
United States Supreme Court
489 U.S. 87 (1989)
Arthur Blanchard (plaintiff) sued James Bergeron and the St. Martin Parish Sheriff’s Department (defendants) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Blanchard had been beaten by Bergeron, a sheriff’s deputy. The jury awarded Blanchard $5,000 in compensatory damages and $5,000 in punitive damages. Blanchard then sought to recover attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. The trial court awarded $7,500 to Blanchard for attorney’s fees. Bergeron appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which held that the attorney’s fees were capped by the contingency-fee agreement between Blanchard and his attorney. The agreement had provided for a contingency fee of 40 percent. The Fifth Circuit accordingly modified the award to 40 percent of $10,000, or $4,000. Blanchard petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
Concurrence (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.