Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Blanton v. Friedberg

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
819 F.2d 489 (4th Cir. 1987)


In separate agreements, Richard Friedberg (defendant) hired Eugene Blanton (plaintiff) to develop two tracts of land that Friedberg owned. Blanton was to be paid in a variety of ways including commissions for the sale of property in the developments and for the sale of timber from one of the developments, consulting fees, percentages of gross rents from property tenants, and Blanton’s expenses. For both projects, Blanton expended significant time and money toward their completion. Before the completion of either project, however, Friedberg fired Blanton. Blanton brought suit for breach of contract and, because Friedberg claimed that no contract existed, for quantum meruit. Blanton sought to recover for his expenses and for his services rendered, for which he had yet to be fully compensated. At trial, Friedberg claimed that most of the development of the properties came after Blanton was fired. Friedberg also claimed that he had paid certain of Blanton’s claimed commissions to other realtors after Blanton was fired, thus reducing what may be allocated to Blanton. The jury found in favor of Blanton. Based on Blanton’s anticipated commissions and fees, the jury awarded Blanton $394,525 for quantum meruit. Friedberg appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Hall, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.