Blaustein v. Lord Baltimore Capital Corporation

84 A.3d 954 (2014)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Blaustein v. Lord Baltimore Capital Corporation

Delaware Supreme Court
84 A.3d 954 (2014)

Facts

Susan M. Blaustein (plaintiff) was a minority shareholder of Lord Baltimore Capital Corporation (LBCC) (defendant), a closely held corporation. Blaustein’s shareholder agreement contained a stock-repurchase provision that provided that LBCC could repurchase Blaustein’s shares upon the approval of a majority of LBCC’s seven-member board of directors. One of the board members, Louis Thalheimer (defendant), allegedly promised that Blaustein would be permitted to sell her shares at full value after 10 years. After the 10-year period expired, Blaustein tried to sell the stock, but LBCC and Louis refused to offer the full value. Blaustein filed suit. LBCC and Louis motioned for summary judgment. Blaustein motioned to amend the complaint to assert directive and derivative claims that LBCC and Louis breached their fiduciary duties and breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by failing to appoint an independent committee to consider and negotiate the repurchase of Blaustein’s shares. The trial court granted LBCC and Louis’s motion and denied Blaustein’s motion. Blaustein appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Berger, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership