Bleday v. OUM Group
Pennsylvania Superior Court
645 A.2d 1358 (1994)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Tracey Worchesky sued Dr. Raymond Bleday (plaintiff) for medical malpractice for alleged issues following a foot surgery. Bleday believed the claim was frivolous and objected to settling it. However, Bleday had malpractice insurance through OUM Group (defendant). The policy said that OUM Group would pay to defend Bleday against any claim, including frivolous claims. Bleday’s policy also had a provision called a deems-expedient provision, which said that OUM Group had the right to settle any covered claim “as it deems expedient.” OUM Group decided it was in its best interest to pay Worchesky a nuisance value of $10,000 to avoid the cost and uncertainty of defending Bleday from the likely frivolous claim at trial. The settlement meant that the claim was never dismissed, and Bleday’s name was put on a list of doctors involved in malpractice actions. Bleday believed this harmed his reputation and sued OUM Group. Bleday argued that OUM Group had breached its duty of good faith when it settled the claim without his consent. The trial court dismissed the claim, and Bleday appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hudock, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
