Blevins v. Rios
California Court of Appeal
2003 WL 463555 (2003)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Louis Stroll, an elderly man, lived alone. Stroll’s adult children did not visit him. In 1992, Stroll hired Rosario Rios (defendant) as his housekeeper. Initially, Rios worked for Stroll once a week; however, over time, Rios began working for Stroll daily and gained access to his keys, mail, checkbook, and bank accounts. In 1999, Stroll executed a change-of-beneficiary form naming Rios as the beneficiary of Stroll’s Veterans Affairs life insurance policy. Rios prepared the form, and Rios’s babysitter witnessed Stroll’s execution of the form. In 2000, Stroll was hospitalized and found to be suffering from a fungal infection and rotten teeth. Shortly after, Stroll’s children discovered Stroll’s apartment was filthy, smelled strongly of urine, and that the refrigerator was empty. Upon review of Stroll’s finances, Stroll’s children discovered Rios had withdrawn $67,500 from Stroll’s accounts in the preceding seven months by writing checks to herself, some of which were written after Stroll’s hospital admission. Rios failed to produce the check register when asked. After Stroll’s death, Margaret Blevins (plaintiff) sued Rios for financial elder abuse, seeking to recover the $67,500 and to void the change-of-beneficiary form that made Rios the beneficiary of Stroll’s Veterans Affairs life insurance policy. Blevins showed that Stroll’s monthly expenses were approximately $1,400. Rios challenged, arguing that Stroll authorized her to withdraw the $67,500 to cover (1) Stroll’s care expenses; and (2) an approximately $16,000 cash gift from Stroll to Rios. Rios did not present any evidence supporting her arguments. Rios admitted she had a fiduciary and confidential relationship with Stroll. The trial court ordered Rios to reimburse the estate for the misappropriated funds, less the $13,000 in salary to which she was entitled, and voided the change-of-beneficiary form. Rios appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Munoz, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.