Bloch v. United States

261 F. Supp. 597 (1966)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Bloch v. United States

United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
261 F. Supp. 597 (1966)

Facts

William Bloch (plaintiff) and B. F. Bryan both owned 45 percent of Southern Elevator and Storage Company, Inc. (company), and Lee Harris owned 10 percent. The company wished to give Harris and William Parrish, the plant manager, an option to purchase stock. The company redeemed 15 percent of the stock from Bloch and Bryan; each received a no-interest promissory note for $35,700, payable within three years. A purchase price lower than the redemption price was offered to Harris and Parrish; Parrish bought two-thirds of the shares, and Harris bought the remaining one-third. Bryan, Bloch, Harris, and Parrish were also partners in a partnership related to the company’s business, formed three years prior to the redemption. Bloch reported the payments from the note as capital gains. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (defendant) assessed a deficiency based on classifying the payments as dividends taxable as ordinary income. Bloch appealed the assessment to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Graven, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership